State and Legislative Issues

Student Fees

Whereas, Many students are eligible for fee waivers;

Whereas, The number of students eligible for fee waivers increases as fees increase; and

Whereas, A large bureaucracy is required to collect fees and to administer fee waivers;

Resolved, That the Academic Senate for California Community Colleges explore the net cost effect to the State of California and to the local districts of increasing student fees and, indeed, of having any student fees whatsoever.

Elimination of Board of Governors and Reduction of System Office

Whereas, The Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges provides independent oversight and policy direction to the 109 community colleges of our system in a public forum and is subject to the Open Meetings Act and the ethical behavior required by law;

Whereas, The California Performance Review proposes the elimination of the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges, although the University of California Board of Regents, the California State University's Board of Trustees, and the State Board of Education (K-12) would remain intact;

California Performance Review

Whereas, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger commissioned the California Performance Review to identify "fraud, waste, and abuse" in state agencies;

Whereas, The California Performance Review purports that its recommendations would result in savings that practitioners and the Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO) contend cannot be achieved, and, according to the LAO, these recommendations may, in fact, cost the state considerably more money than is presently expended; and

Career Ladders Implementation

Whereas, The California Performance Review makes recommendations regarding economic and workforce development;

Whereas, Research conducted by the Career Ladders Project has identified both effective practices and areas in need of improvement, such as student support services and integration with college curriculum; and

Whereas, The Academic Senate for California Community Colleges has long supported the concepts contained in the Career Ladders Project as an effective means to improve workforce development;

Mission of the California Community Colleges

Whereas, The California Performance Review makes extensive reference to the vocational/career/workforce development function of the California community colleges;

Whereas, Recommendation ETV26 suggests that the California community colleges should "reinforce the priority of the economic and workforce development role of community colleges;"

Whereas, The California community colleges have multiple missions defined in Education Code 66010.1 through 66010.8, including degrees, transfer, basic skills, as well as vocational; and

Process for Revision of Education Code

Whereas the Chancellor's Office has instituted the Education Code Reform Initiative, and

Whereas this reform initiative affects all levels within the system, faculty, students, administrators, trustees, the Chancellor, and the Board of Governors, and

Whereas all of the above mentioned constituencies must have opportunity for ongoing dialogue and input to recommendations for reform of the Education Code,

Increased Funding for Noncredit Courses

Whereas many colleges offer remedial courses through the noncredit mode, and

Whereas many of our students in transfer classes have deficiencies in skills that may include reading, mathematical computation, writing, and communication,

Resolved that the Academic Senate for California Community Colleges urge the community college organizations to support increased funding for noncredit courses to the level of 80% of the current credit funding. MSR

Student Fees

Whereas, The Academic Senate for California Community Colleges has a long and consistent history of resolutions that oppose both the introduction of and subsequent increases in mandatory student fees in the California Community College System;

Whereas, Recent fee changes have increased student fees by 136%, have doubled the revenue collected in student fees and have reduced the level of state support (Proposition 98 dollars per funded FTES) and constitute an increased user tax on those least able to pay;

Fees Paper

Resolved, That the Academic Senate for California Community Colleges adopt the paper What's Wrong with Student Fees? Renewing the Commitment to No-Fee, Open-Access Community Colleges in California.

Yes On Proposition 47

Whereas, Proposition 47-the Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 2002-provides $13.05 billion in bonds to relieve overcrowding; reduce class size; and repair and upgrade California's elementary, middle and high schools, community colleges, and universities; and guarantees California community colleges 40% of the higher education share;


Subscribe to RSS - State and Legislative Issues